workers have changed. They had plenty of knowledge of their durability and usefulness. In Docs 3 and 4, there is admiration shown for the work of another. This document shows a negative effect because technology advanced leading to higher prices and by tools becoming less valuable. I think these documents are all negative because they all show effects of how technology has over powered many distinct possessions. Although Doc 6 is about the admiration for anothers work, that is the end of the Roman compliments. Rupertus, aP World History, september 25, 2014. If we had the journal of an average citizen, we would get information from someone who deals with these situations firsthand. Three additional documents that would further assist in answering the question are: a statement from a Roman women, someone of the lower class in the Han dynasty and a Roman craftsman. Plutarch says that political leader Gaius was really into the road building project and how considerate he was he was of people and this positive because the roads went straight through the country and was beautiful as well.
The Roman and the Han had diverse attitudes towards technology being essential, since the Romans had social stratification they viewed technology differently because the level of appreciation of technology varied from the upper 2007 DBQ Sample. Themed Learning includes: China Review. Technology during the Han and Roman empires was seen as a tool to show how great and powerful the empire was.
Both empires were proud of their.
This shows that the Hans really were proud of their work and saw their technology as a way to portray their supremacy just as the Romans did.
2007 DBQ : Han and Roman Attitudes Toward Technology.
April 29 teach essay skills is the AP World History Course Description, (aka the.
Essay on the nature of trade in general
Good habits essay in english
Translate essay to swahili dictionary, Your educational career goals essay, Essay about advertising in school,